Navigating the Turbulence of Aircraft Lease Returns: Common Pitfalls and Best Practices

Aircraft lease returns are a critical juncture in the lifecycle of an aircraft, demanding meticulous attention to detail and a thorough understanding of lease agreements. While the goal is a seamless transition, several recurring issues can disrupt this process, leading to disputes, delays, and unforeseen costs. By understanding these common pitfalls and implementing proactive strategies, both lessors and lessees can ensure smoother transitions and protect their interests.

For operation  maintaining airworthiness is paramount, but this does not mean lease compliance and any discrepancies in this area can be a major source of contention. Key challenges include:

  • Record-Keeping Deficiencies: Incomplete or inaccurate maintenance records are a frequent issue. Missing logbook entries, undocumented repairs, or discrepancies between physical condition and recorded data can raise concerns about airworthiness and compliance with the lease agreement. Remember that compliance with airworthiness is not the same as the lease conditions, compliant records for airworthiness does not mean compliant records for lease return!
  • LLP and HT Item Management: Life Limited Parts (LLPs) and Hard Time (HT) items require strict adherence to maintenance schedules, but often have an underlaying more restrictive condition relating to the lease conditions. Failure to track and manage these components can lead to components remaining airworthy, but not being accepted at lease return.
  1. Beyond Airworthiness: Physical Condition and Configuration:

While airworthiness is fundamental, lease returns also involve scrutiny of the aircraft’s physical condition and configuration. Common issues include:

  • Undocumented Damage: Damage such as dents, scratches, and corrosion, when found at the transition can lead to disputes and timely repair costs. Thorough pre-return inspections and clear documentation of any damage are essential to avoid disagreements.
  • Non-Original Parts: The presence of non-original parts can violate lease agreements and necessitate costly rectification. Maintaining accurate configuration records and ensuring all parts are accounted for are crucial – an example might be the use of PMA parts on engines.
  • Modifications and STCs: Unauthorised modifications in the returning jurisdiction such as a non approved STC in EASA or deviations from the agreed-upon configuration can lead to complications such as different weight variant on return.
  1. The Importance of Traceability:
  • Back-to-Birth Traceability: Providing complete documentation of a component’s history, from manufacture to installation, is essential for demonstrating compliance and maintaining asset value. This is particularly important for LLPs and high-value components. Implementing robust tracking systems and maintaining comprehensive records throughout the lease term are crucial.
  • Configuration Management: Accurate records of the aircraft’s configuration, including installed components, modifications, and maintenance history, are vital for ensuring compliance and preventing disputes.
  1. Navigating Lease Agreements:
  • Clarity and Interpretation: Misinterpretation of lease requirements related to maintenance, return conditions, and responsibilities can lead to disagreements, in a lease the terms are defined, clear and concise. Communication between lessors and lessees is essential at all stages.
  • Timely Return Conditions: Failing to meet the specific return conditions outlined in the lease agreement, such as paint scheme, interior configuration, or engine conditions, can result in penalties regarding time overrun. Lessees must carefully review and adhere to the return conditions to ensure a smooth transition and try to avoid delays in aircraft returns.
  • Demonstration Flights: Plan the correct flight profile as per lease return with an appropriately authorised and approved operator – Demonstration / Proving flights are not routine flights and often require specific approvals for the operator.

What can we do? Proactive Risk Mitigation:

  • Pre-Return Inspections: Conducting thorough pre-return inspections well in advance of the lease expiry date allows for the identification and rectification of potential issues, minimizing delays and disputes.
  • Expert Consultation: Engaging experienced technical personnel and legal counsel can help navigate complex lease agreements, ensure compliance, and provide guidance on managing potential risks – email info@ialta.aero to see how we can assist you.
  • Open Communication: Maintaining open and transparent communication between lessors and lessees throughout the lease term can help prevent misunderstandings, address concerns promptly, and a timely managed lease return.

By recognizing these common challenges and implementing proactive strategies, aircraft operators and lessors can navigate the complexities of aircraft lease returns more effectively, ensuring a smoother transition, minimizing costs, and preserving valuable assets.

Follow us on LinkedIn and to learn more why not check out our courses https://ialta.aero